Guizhou adulterer “beheaded his wife after being released from prison” and was sentenced to a suspended death sentence. Judge: The deceased had some responsibilities

AI summary

Summary of article:

Liu Nan, from Qianxi city, Guizhou province, suspected that his wife was cheating on her husband and committed suicide with a knife. In both the first and second cases, he was sentenced to death with a two-year suspended sentence and limited punishment. The court also considered some degree of responsibility of the deceased as a sentencing consideration.

A man surnamed Liu in Qianxi city of Guizhou province, China, suspected that his wife surnamed Zhang was cheating on him during their marriage. He repeatedly hit his wife on the head with a kitchen knife, causing Zhang to die from her injuries. The court of first instance sentenced Liu Nan to deliberate murder.death penalty Ban suspended for 2 years and sentence reduction; Recently the court of second instance has given a final decision and upheld the original decision.

The Yangzi Evening News reported that the verdict revealed that Mr Liu and Ms Zhang ran a pig slaughtering and selling business after they were married and had a daughter. Liu Nan was criminally detained in September 2024 for selling pork of unknown cause of death, and sentenced to 6 months in prison in February 2025. While Liu was serving his sentence, Zhang had entered a hotel room with other men and had inappropriate relations.

In March 2025, after Mr. Liu was released from prison, the two had several fights because Ms. Zhang worked at KTV. On April 1 of the same year, Liu Nan checked Ms. Zhang’s mobile phone consumption records and found that she had booked rooms in several hotels. After his request to see the monitor screen was denied, he passedWeChat In the video, Zhang and her two daughters have been threatened with death. That night, Ms. Zhang convinces him to go home.

At about 10 a.m. the next day, Mr. Liu asked Ms. Zhang to find relatives with him to watch the hotel monitor footage, and the two parties argued again. Liu Nan then picked up a kitchen knife at home and stabbed Ms. Zhang several times in the head. Zhang’s father and others arrived at the scene and immediately called the police and an ambulance. However, Zhang was still seriously injured and died after the rescue attempt failed.

Liu Nan also later injured himself with a knife and attempted suicide. After identification, Mr. Liu had no mental illness at the time of the crime and had full capacity to bear criminal responsibility.

The court held that Liu Nan had committed another crime within 5 years after the execution of the previous crime sentence, and was a repeat offender. The method of murder was particularly cruel and the crime extremely serious. He should be given death penalty as per law. However, considering that Ms. Zhang “had a certain degree of responsibility” for the occurrence of the case, and that Mr. Liu truthfully admitted the facts of the crime, confessed and repented after being brought to justice, he was sentenced to death with suspended execution and limited reduction in sentence.

Family members of the deceased said that during the first trial, Liu Nan argued that it was Zhang who first attacked with the knife and then he retaliated with the knife. Family member Ms Chen said Mr Liu once said he “regretted doing this”, but insisted: “We will never forgive him.” Ms Zhang’s father said the family had applied for a protest at the procuratorate but it had been rejected. After that, Mr. Liu appealed, and now the second instance has upheld the original verdict.

Summary FAQ


  • The verdict reported that after examining his wife’s mobile phone consumption records, Mr. Liu discovered that she had visited a room with others several times. He suspected that the other party was cheating on him during the marriage and argued with his wife. Finally, he killed her by repeatedly hitting her on the head with a kitchen knife.


  • The court believed that he was a repeat offender of cruel methods, and that according to law he should have been given the death penalty. However, given that the deceased had a certain degree of responsibility for the incident, and Mr. Liu confessed truthfully after getting to the case and confessed and repented, he was sentenced to death with a suspended sentence and limited punishment.


  • The court of second instance upheld the original verdict of the first instance trial and still sentenced Liu Nan to death with a two-year suspended sentence and limited reduction in sentence. The family of the deceased said that they would not forgive him, and mentioned that they had applied for protest but were rejected, and Liu Nan eventually appealed.

Share on Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *