AI summary
Summary of article:
Hu Zijin published a series of articles in response to rumors that Huang Renxun had an affair and that Huang Le was involved in espionage, claiming it was a political operation, and questioning the lack of evidence for the “Chinese female spy” statement.
HUIDA CEOJen-Hsun Huang Affair partner Huang Le is accused of being Chinesedetective Attracted a lot of attention. In response, Hu Shi, former editor-in-chief of the Global Times, rarely published two articles in less than four hours, emphasizing that this was a political incident. China’s intelligence community never specifically uses honey traps and never requires female intelligence officers to “go to bed” to achieve mission goals. In addition, Huang Renxun has not said that he accepts the media’s identification of Huang Le as a “Chinese female spy”.
hu zijin At about 12:00 on the 9th, he posted on his personal social platform that Huang admitted to cheating on Sunday night (US time) and apologized to his family and the company. “First of all, this is not an ordinary scandal, this is politics,” he stressed, adding that this is a way for the Democratic Party and the American establishment to mess with Huang Jen-hsun and then Trump.
If the US intelligence agency determined that Huang Le was a “Chinese female spy”, they should have warned Huang Renxun privately first. However, he exposed the matter to the media, allowing the matter to spread into the field of public opinion first, forcing Huang Renxun to admit fraud and apologize publicly. This is a slap in the face to Huang Renxun and Huida.
Hu Zijin said that political fermentation has already occurred. Shortly after the initial New York Times report came out, several congressional committees decided to summon Huang Jen-hsun and ask him to clearly explain. But he strongly suspected that Huang Le was not a “Chinese female spy” at all.
Hu Zijin said that he has a background in intelligence. To the best of their knowledge, the Chinese intelligence community has never specifically used honey traps. “We guard against beauty traps, but we never need to achieve our mission goals by having sex with female intelligence officers.” Therefore, she believed that Huang Le and Huang Renxun were more likely to meet in the shopping mall, and Huang Renxun developed feelings for her; Huang Le admired Huang Renxun and developed a love relationship between a man and a woman.
Hu Zijin re-posted at around 16:00, saying that Huang Renxun apologized to his family and the company and supported Huida’s investigation of national security concerns. But he did not apologize to the United States and made no mention of the widely reported incident involving Huang Le. This first shows that Huang Renxun’s emotional foundation is still on the side of his wife and family, and he wants to return.
Secondly, Hu Zijin believes that in addition to the apology, Huang Renxun has not yet said that she accepts the media’s identification of Huang Le as a “Chinese female spy”. It is more likely that he still believes that his relationship with Huang Le is pure love between a man and a woman, which goes beyond business interests and does not involve politics.
Hu Zijin emphasized that Huang Renxun is a very smart and agile person. If a woman approaches him with business or even intelligence calculations, his sense of smell should be enough to instantly awaken his alertness.
Hu Zijin believes that if Huang Renxun is now convinced that Huang Le is a “Chinese female spy”, she can mention something like “caught in a trap” and “momentary confusion” in her apology statement, so that she can better demonstrate her loyalty to the United States. But in his entire statement it was said that he had made a mistake and he would have to take full responsibility for it. He did not accuse or blame the woman.
Hu Zijin pointed out that Huang Renxun’s stance is to wait for the conclusion of Huida’s security investigation and present more evidence to prove the media’s allegation by the US intelligence agency that Huang Le is a “Chinese spy”. “Let us focus on the next turn of events,” he concluded.
Summary FAQ
-
Hu Zijin believes that this is not just an ordinary scandal, but an incident with political motives, and also involves the Democratic Party and the American establishment attacking Huang Renxun and Huida. He claimed that after the news was leaked in the media, public opinion first erupted, which had a political impact.
-
Hu Zijin highly suspects that Huang Le is not a Chinese female spy at all, and said that the Chinese intelligence community does not specifically use honey traps, nor does it require female intelligence officers to use sexual relations to accomplish their tasks. He prefers to believe that the two met in a business environment and a relationship developed between them naturally.
-
Hu Zijin reported that Huang Renxun only apologized to his family and company and supported Huida’s investigation, but did not apologize to the United States, nor did he mention that Huang Le was a spy or that he was trapped in a trap. He interpreted this to mean that Huang had still not pleaded guilty to the relevant charges.
