AI summary
Summary of article:
Luo Dayou fiercely criticized Lai Qingde, Zhuo Rongtai, and the Democratic Progressive Party in the radio program, and increased their accusations of imbalance between cultural subsidies, freedom of speech, and political stances. His aggressive words created controversy.
Luo Dayou appeared on Tang Xianglong’s radio program “UFO Breakfast” today, and directly targeted the President of Taiwanlai qingde Talk to the Chairman of the Executive Yuanzhuo rongtai “They are getting together, and they are from the same political party. They are getting together, doing things that are clearly illegal, and they are shameless. They also say that they will insist on doing it to the end. This is very unbearable. This is very bad. This is shameless. When did Taiwanese people become so shameless.”
Luo Dayou said that he started at about the same time as Ono, Wu Nianzhen and others, but he never dared to call himself a cultural figure easily. He was surprised by some of the people who published a book or two or made a few documentaries and claimed to be cultural people. He angrily criticized the DPP for reducing cultural boundaries, leading to a decline in cultural standards and degradation of national character. He even said that Ma Shifang supported the DPP just to eat. Host Tang Xianglong replied, “Because in that circle, everyone knows where the money comes from.”
Tang Xianglong admitted that he had never received subsidies in his career as a programmer, and he questioned the multi-million dollar subsidy received by the Ministry of Culture for Shen Boyang’s campaign theme song production team. He also said that he had never applied for any award. Luo Deyu praised it very much. He emphasized that a person must have standards based on what Mencius said, “Poverty and meekness cannot advance, power cannot stoop.” However, he forgot that he had applied for several Golden Horse Awards and Golden Melody Awards since 1990, and also won the Golden Melody Award Special Contribution Award 5 years ago.
Luo Dayou also said that money is useless in the creative industry. “A good record can be made with just a guitar, so why do you need subsidies? Only people who don’t have enough material need subsidies. What can we do with the government?” This is like dragging all those films, singers and plays that have received subsidies from the Culture Ministry into creating controversy.
Luo Deyu talked about it againTsai Ing-Wen Xiao Meiqin and Chen Xu all have no children. Lai Qingde’s son was sent to the United States, unlike his own children. “We think too much about the next generation. These people don’t think too much. Taiwanese, wake up for the next generation.”
Furthermore, Luo Dayou believes that the public is wrong to be afraid of speaking out. “Didn’t the DPP fight for human rights earlier? Didn’t it ask everyone to speak as much as possible? Didn’t it fight for 100% freedom of speech? How has it now become a cause of fear for everyone. This is shameless. This is too shameless. This is just for power. Everything changes once you gain power.” As the saying goes, when the position of a person’s butt changes, so does his head. He said: “After Lai Qingde changed his butt, his head became his butt and he started talking through his butthole.”
Summary FAQ
-
He accused Lai Ching-tak and Zhuo Rongtai of “working together in collusion”. He believed that both men did something that was clearly illegal but they had no shame and continued to do so until the end. He also criticized his policies and character in strong words.
-
He criticized the DPP for reducing cultural boundaries and leading to a decline in cultural standards. He also questioned the interdependence between cultural subsidies, awards, and political stances and believed that some creators expressed their opinions for profit.
-
Luo Dayou used Tsai Ing-wen, Xiao Meiqin, Chen Xu to say that they had no children, and Lai Qingde’s son to be sent to the United States to emphasize that he cared more about the next generation, thereby criticizing politicians for their lack of long-term thinking.
