AI summary
Summary of article:
In an exclusive interview, Shen Boyang described Jiang Wannan as a good and respectable opponent. At the same time, responding to issues such as defamation, employment, and the Taipei Research Institute, he stressed that he would not be interfered with by factions and would respect parliamentary supervision.
Democratic Progressive Party candidate for mayor of TaipeiShen Boyang In an exclusive interview with the “Taiwan Frontier” program broadcast tonight, Shen Boyang was askedxiang wannan In their opinion he is a respectable opponent, has a good reputation and speaks politely.
FTV News’s “Taiwan Frontline” program broadcast an exclusive interview with Shen Boyang in the evening. Kuomintang Taipei City Councilor Qin Huizhu and others were invited to serve as questioners. Qin Huizu noted that Shen Boyang at least had a certain chance of being elected, but grassroots civil servants in Beijing city were nervous that Shen might be elected mayor. He asked Shen whether he had thought about city government workers after being elected and whether the Democratic Progressive Party faction might intervene.
Qin Huiju also mentioned whether the former chairman of UMC would be invitedCao Jingcheng Serving as an advisor to the Taipei City Government, Kao calls this mayoral election a confrontation between bodhisattvas and evil spirits. Shen is called a Bodhisattva. Is his rival an evil spirit?
Shen Boyang first answered that he grew up in Xinyi District of Songshan and had seen the very senior Congressman Qin since childhood, so he answered the question with some trepidation. He said that he thought that Chiang Wan-nan, the mayor of Taipei, was also a Bodhisattva because his image was very good and his speeches were polite.
Shen Boyang said, but it has to be said that there was too much slander against him in the last two months of the mayoral election. The correspondence between truth, goodness and beauty was evil and lying, such as using false information or taking quotes out of context. Although these things were not done by Jiang Wannan, they were done by Jiang’s team. Qin Huizu asked why he thought Jiang was an evil spirit? Shen Boyang said that this is not at the level of an evil spirit, “But to me, at least it is not something a Bodhisattva would do. Jiang Wannan is a respectable opponent.”
Responding to the appointment method when elected as mayor, Shen Boyang said that he has no faction within the Democratic Progressive Party. For example, when he ran for mayor, he did not allow others to join the campaign team. The recruitment method should be to find excellent talents. There will be no so called placement problem. It should be possible to find talent from native civil servants.
Qin Huizhu asked that if the Democratic Progressive Party faction forces people to come to the city government, can they oppose it? Shen Boyang said that because he has never come into contact with this kind of thing, he finds the whole thing a bit strange. As long as someone introduces them to a talent, they will make their own assessment and will not care about that person’s original faction within the party.
On whether to ask Cao Jingcheng to serve as a municipal advisor of the northern city government, Shen Boyang said that he thought Cao probably did not want to be a municipal advisor, and he would not ask Cao to become a municipal advisor. Qin Huiju also mentioned that if Shen Boyang is elected, he will launch the Taipei Research Institute. It is an organization outside the system, which may prevent lawmakers from monitoring it, and may cause it to become a “Taiwan Emperor” organization.
Shen Boyang pointed out that assuming an administrative legal person approach is adopted, such as Beiliu, who leads the city’s music policy, the establishment of the Taipei Research Institute is mainly to formulate plans but must still be passed by parliament to form the basis for civil servants’ compliance. He adopted a more creative idea, because there are think tanks in first-tier cities in various countries, so he named it Taipei Research Institute.
Summary FAQ
-
Shen Boyang said that he always thought Jiang Wannan had a good image and was very polite in his speech, so he regarded him as a respectful opponent and did not directly regard the opponent as a malicious character.
-
Shen Boyang pointed out that there was a lot of slander and out-of-context misinformation in the last two months of the election. Although this was not necessarily what Jiang Wannan himself did, he believed that the relevant practices came from the opponent’s team and deviated from the Bodhisattva standard in his mind.
-
Shen Boyang emphasized that he would not divide into factions when hiring people, but would give priority to talents and abilities, and would not appoint Cao Jingcheng as a municipal advisor. As for the Taipei Research Institute, if it adopts the administrative legal person model, it still needs to be approved by the Parliament before it can operate.
