AI summary
Summary of article:
The Global Times criticized the US media for forcibly linking Huang’s extramarital affair to rumors of Chinese spying, questioning the intention behind it to incite conflict and calling for an investigation of the facts and evidence.
CEO of NvidiaJen-Hsun Huang Admitted to extramarital affair on the 8th. Foreign media had earlier reported that a woman close to him was suspected of working for Chinese intelligence agencies. In response, China’s official media “Global Times” published a quick comment today (9th), criticizing the US media for directly comparing “Huang Renxun’s admission of fraud” with “Huang Renxun’s admission of infiltration by China”, and questioned why China chose “China” at this time when Sino-US relations are showing signs of easing.detective “With all this sudden thunder, is there someone behind the scenes who is pushing the agenda and instigating conflict?”
“Global Times” on the 9th published “Huang Renxun’s fraud, can China be involved?” Published a quick comment titled. It said Huang Renxun’s admission of extramarital affairs ignited public opinion in the United States. However, the reason why the American media was so excited about this incident was obviously not only the promising news of a rich American businessman, but also a “fascinating” report in the “New York Times” a few days ago, claiming that the target of Huang Renxun’s case was a “Chinese intelligence officer”.
The article criticized that the mix of wealthy businessmen, fraud, and Chinese female spies has driven the American media crazy, and they pointed the finger at China, almost directly comparing “Huang Jen-hsun has admitted to fraud” with “Huang Jen-hsun has admitted to infiltration by China”, even though he did not reveal the identity of his extramarital affair partner at all.
The article also pointed out that a few photos of oriental faces, Huida’s previous actions to promote the easing of trade restrictions with China, and the words of so-called “informed people” and the media’s “skepticism” were enough to add fuel to the fire as “Chinese female spies infiltrated US chip companies.” The American media, which has always prided itself on being “objective”, produces stories this way.
The article mentioned that China’s Foreign Ministry had previously strongly denied the report, saying that the related reports were based on false allegations and were purely slander and defamation against China. Singapore’s Home Ministry also quickly issued a statement clarifying that US media reports that Singapore authorities had “expressed concerns” about the woman and “investigated her ties to China” were false.
In addition, the article also pointed out that some analysts suspected that someone was deliberately suppressing the news when the New York Times published news before and after the US midterm elections. Currently, there is a situation of hard-earned tension between China and the United States. The demands of both sides are to resolve differences and stabilize bilateral relations. Why does the “Chinese espionage” scandal suddenly come to light at this time? Is there someone behind pushing this agenda and provoking conflict?
The article states that similar situations have occurred repeatedly in the past. Whenever China-America relations start improving, someone often fires the bullet from behind the curtain. This “coincidence” is similar to many “coincidences” in the past.
The article concluded by emphasizing that even if Huida’s board of directors launched an independent investigation, the investigation should focus on the facts and present solid evidence rather than following the “anti-China script” predetermined by the media. The global technology industry chain is highly interconnected. If this logic of “presumption of guilt” is allowed to spread, normal technology and economic and trade exchanges will continue to consume public opinion, which will put pressure on China and the United States and the global industry chain.
Summary FAQ
-
The Global Times believes that this approach is based on speculation, which directly turns personal love stories into a “China intrusion” narrative that lacks clear evidence, and increases stigma and opposition to China.
-
The article pointed out that at present there are signs of easing in China-US relations, but relevant rumors are being suddenly publicized at this time, causing the outside world to suspect that someone is deliberately slacking off and pushing the agenda, thereby inflaming public opinion and destroying the atmosphere of bilateral cooling.
-
The article advocates that even if the board of directors of Huida launches an independent investigation, it should focus on the facts themselves and present concrete evidence, rather than pre-qualify according to the anti-China script pre-determined by the media, so as not to harm scientific and technological economic and trade exchanges.
