AI summary
Summary of article:
Liu Xiuqi, a former member of Meixiu Group, was inspected while driving in the early morning. Police found a bag of suspected drug residue in the car and booked him on suspicion of drug and public danger offences. He denied possession, claiming that the objects were not his own and that the procedures were questionable.
Liu Xiuqi, a former member of “Mexiu Group”, was driving in the early hours of last month. The police stopped him during a road inspection and found that his eyes were disoriented and he was unconscious. He asked for spit-screening, but he was refused. The police found a bag of debris from the car suspected to be Meow Meow’s, arrested him and transferred him on suspicion of drugs and public danger, and prosecuted him according to the Road Traffic Management Penalty Regulations.
He was stopped by police while driving in 2021 and foundmarijuana Electronic cigarette cartridge, urine test results were negative, and the prosecution was suspended. He said that the shadow of past incidents had fallen on him and the negative impact continues even today, so this time during the inspection he will exercise his rights as per the law. He also stressed that although the zipper bag was in the car, it was not his luggage. “I was not speeding, driving at an unusual speed, or driving in any particularly dangerous manner.”
Liu Xiuqi said there were also discrepancies in the on-site personnel’s initial inspection and interpretation of the contents of the bags, and the color of the test strips also changed. “To help clarify the truth, I immediately cooperated in fingerprint collection and testing and other operational procedures.” He has now entrusted the responsibility of handling it to a lawyer.
Full text of Liu Xiuqi’s statement:
In connection with the fact that I went through police inspection and subsequent investigative procedures at approximately 1 am on October 16, 2026, I would like to declare as follows:
In the past, when the police stopped me for inspection, I actively cooperated in the search of the vehicle and cannabis oil was found in the vehicle. At that time, I made it clear that the item did not belong to me and I did not know its origin. However, before the relevant facts and investigation results were clarified, it was widely reported by the media, causing serious damage to my reputation, life, and physical and mental condition. After about three months of formal urine testing, the results confirmed that all drug tests conducted on me were “negative.” However, subsequent test results did not receive the same coverage and attention as the initial incident, and the associated negative effects continue to this day.
When I went through this clinical inspection, I was under psychological pressure because of the above experience, and I was worried about the accuracy of the initial screening results. I was even more concerned about the official test results being reported publicly before they were confirmed. Therefore, I exercised my rights as per law and did not agree to the alternative vehicle search and saliva rapid screening. The above is an explanation based on my reaction and background at the time. It is not intended to question or create opposition to the testing system or law enforcement personnel.
The police later arrested me on suspicion of public danger, but I was not driving dangerously, driving at an unusual speed, or driving in any particularly dangerous manner. As for the ziplock bag included in the case, it was placed with other people’s empty cigarette cartons and other items left in my car and was not owned by me. There was no total weight of any of the drugs in the bag, and personnel on site during the initial inspection also interpreted the contents of the bag differently, and the color of the test paper also changed. Therefore, there are still many doubts about the actual composition and nature of the substances in the bag. To help clarify the truth, I immediately cooperated in fingerprint collection and testing and other tasks.
I fully understand that the public attaches great importance to traffic safety and public order, and I fully respect the investigation conducted by judicial authorities in accordance with the law. However, before the results of the investigation are determined, I sincerely request friends and media from all walks of life not to draw conclusions based on the principles of presumption of innocence and verification that I am involved in illegal activities based on lack of consent to the search or other unilateral information. I also pray that I can remain objective and fair when reporting and fully present the context of the incident and the subsequent formal inspection results.
Other relevant matters such as the specific facts of the case, the basis of law enforcement and the legality of the process will be confirmed by lawyers and clarified through formal legal procedures. Before that, I will not discuss individual legal issues one by one in detail. If there are any matters in the future that need to be explained to the public, they will be announced at the appropriate time after confirmation. Thanks for your concern.
Summary FAQ
-
Earlier last month, he was stopped by police during a road inspection while driving. The police felt that his eyes had wandered and he was unconscious. He immediately asked for a saliva test but was refused. Later, a bag of suspected meow meow remains was found in the car, so he was arrested and transferred for investigation.
-
The police transferred him to justice on suspicion of drug and public danger crimes, and also prosecuted him in accordance with the Road Traffic Management Penalties Regulations. The main issues were his refusal to be tested, suspected drug paraphernalia, and whether he was engaging in dangerous behavior while driving.
-
He emphasized that he did not have a ziplock bag, and had no dangerous driving behavior at the time, such as dozing off or driving at high speed. He also said that there were inconsistencies in the description of the contents of the bag at the scene. He had collaborated with fingerprint collection and lawyers to handle it, and hoped that premature conclusions would not be drawn before the results were determined.
