Big Quick Review/Shen Boyang’s words reveal more of the companionship type

AI summary

Summary of article:

The comment pointed out that Shen Boyang packed the city into a “companion-type” discussion but lacked specific solutions. Compared with Jiang Wannan’s policy instruments and border adjustments, it raised the question that his political ideas were hollow and difficult to solve the plight of Beshi City.

The Taipei mayoral election debate is like a mirror looking into the devil’s eyes. It has updated the urgent needs of old houses in Taipei City.Democratic Progressive Party taipei mayor candidateshen boyang The sentence “What is more needed is to start construction and complete the project, but the most important thing is to accompany” has made many netizens witness “What is the real question A and the answer is B”. Although companionship is important, it is not the real solution.

After the debate on October 31, Shen Boyang’s colleagues also discussed becoming a target of the Blue and White. “Conan takes over the case” in a hurry to find the mayor of Taipei.xiang wannan In June this year, when he inspected the Xinwei housing renovation project, he also said, “Public housing is not only a reconstruction, but also a long-term cooperation along the way.” Although Jiang and Shen both mentioned the term “accompanying”, their methods were different, and the results were naturally different. Jiang Wannan had already introduced the “duel of the eight arrows” policy, but the green camp thought that when Google came along with them, it meant that “Jiang Weila” was caught. In fact, it was just “Zhang Fei beating Yue Fei”.

“Apart from helping with test counts and organizing briefings, the most important thing is to propose practical measures.” Jiang Wannan said for the first time that it does not matter whether it is lowering the threshold for public office, such as 90%, 75% and now 50%, including the current road outline update, the benchmark volume of more than 3,000 square meters adjacent to the coast and around the MRT has been increased from 225% to 300%. There should be specific measures to advance urban renewal.

Shen Boyang created his own “Eternal Urban Renewal” and advocated the establishment of the “Old House Service Group” to provide relevant information and reassure citizens. He also proposed to increase the entire housing-related fund by 20%, supplement public manpower, strengthen the energy of urban centers, and finally solve the “zombie urban renewal” problem according to urban renewal regulations.

It seems that Shen Boyang has solved the problems of insufficient information, administrative support and subsidy applications, but has not solved the more difficult major obstacles such as property rights integration, residents’ disagreement, builder’s finance, land value and reconstruction cost. Moreover, the outside world does not know the benchmark scale of the entire House fund. The 20% increase is just an abstract ratio. It is not a complete financial plan and lacks supporting manpower planning. As far as Shen Boyang’s declaration of unlimited urban renewal is concerned, the first thing to do is to build housing first and break the concept of land private ownership with land rights housing. The top priority is that Taipei City has a lot of land. Where should new homes be built?

Facing the advantage of the outgoing Jiang Wannan, a common problem with Yangliu’s political views is that the first to shout is the first to win. In any case, the Internet army will follow and applaud. However, if political leaders don’t take the right steps, they could make the “hell city update” problem worse. Shen Boyang’s dream politics “does not know the budget, does not set the schedule, and is unrealistic.” They only see hollow beauty and warmth. The result is that “the house will grow old, and the people will grow old.”

Shen Boyang constantly emphasizes the “temperature” of companionship, but the solution of the two elders in Beshi requires “speed” and “height”. The focus is on solving problems, not staying together for warmth. Jiang Wannan said in the debate that Shen Boyang did not understand municipal affairs and was only “reading chaos”. The number of police cases in Beijing city was 2.4 times that of the previous one and 1.3 times that of the other five cities. However, the case number consolidation process in Siwenli District of Datong District has only lasted ten years. The 12 districts of West Lake and Wan Chai subdistricts of Nehu District are high-density residential areas that are dangerous and outdated, and have not been updated for many years. The problem lies in the altitude limit of Songshan Airport, making it even more difficult.

This is not psychological counseling. Citizens do not need to come to the mayor to raise concerns. Shen Boyang criticized Jiang Wannan’s policy of “only entry and no exit”, but he also couldn’t tell how many houses he would build, how much land he would need, how much manpower and budget he would spend. He was essentially demonstrating to himself “Ask A and answer B”; If only asking for help can turn an old house into a new one, and housing exchange can allow land to circulate endlessly, then this group of political ideas may be able to compete for the “Nobel Prize.” However, urban renewal cannot rely only on slogans, and citizens cannot use their homes to conduct political experiments with candidates.

Summary FAQ


  • Because they focused more on “companionship” and emotional support, but did not clearly answer core issues such as property rights integration, tenant consent, financial costs and land sources, it was believed that they did not really solve the problem.


  • The article mentioned that Jiang Wannan’s “eight arrows” for urban renewal include lowering the threshold for public urban renewal, enhancing the benchmark ability of specific areas, assisting in conducting test calculations and briefings, emphasizing the need to use practical policies to promote urban renewal.


  • This is because although he proposed ideas such as an old home service team and increasing funding and manpower, he did not explain the budget scale, implementation schedule and where new homes should be built, nor did he address the issues of land shortage and reconstruction integration in Taipei City.

Share on Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *