After the debate, Shen Boyang: Jiang Wannan’s question A, answer B and spreading rumors are disappointing, and the framing of the question is not unreasonable.

AI summary

Summary of article:

Shen Boyang said that in the first mayoral debate, Jiang Wanyan answered questions that were inappropriate and contained rumors, which disappointed him. However, he also stressed that there is still a need to continue hard work to change the situation of elections and elections.

The first debate on the Taipei mayor election was held yesterday.Democratic Progressive Party candidateshen boyang Today (November 1) in an interview he bluntly said,xiang wannan The debate was “ask A and answer B”, and even the answers contained a lot of misinformation and even rumors. However, due to the rules of debate, he was unable to answer one by one, which caused him great disappointment. However, yesterday’s poll showed that 47% believed Shane’s performance was better. Shen said that the public will have their own public comments on the debate, but the overall support level is basically one side to hold, and they will still have to work hard to reverse it.

Yesterday’s “TVBS” conducted a survey in the afternoon after the debate. Among them, 47% of respondents believed that Shen Boyang performed better and 40% believed that Chiang Wannan performed better. However, polls from both parties showed Shen still trailing Chiang. Shen Boyang said that the public had its own public opinion in yesterday’s debate, and the polls certainly reflected some of it. However, in terms of overall support, they are a chasing side, and they still have to work hard to come back and win in the last 27 days.

This morning, Shen Boyang participated in Hong Kong and Lex parliamentary candidate Chen Yuxin’s “Hong Kong and Lex Don’t Talk Nonsense” talk show. Shen also revealed that he was a little disappointed when he faced Jiang Wannan’s “Ask A and Answer B” in yesterday’s debate, but after the night, it should be okay. Shen Ye yesterday angrily criticized Chiang for giving out too much misinformation and spreading rumors when answering. After all, he was the one asking the questions at the moment and couldn’t tell everyone about his every mistake. This was also a limitation of the debate itself.

When asked about the question of fairness of the candidates’ camps during a media question-and-answer session, Shen Boyang said that there was nothing inappropriate and that the debate consultation had already been discussed. Because he really wanted to promote this debate, he ultimately accepted the time chosen by the other side, what format they used, and what the organizer proposed.

Regarding the confrontation between the two on the child abuse issue on the debate stage yesterday, Jiang Wannan said that he had personally gone to meet the parents. Shen Boyang said that meeting parents is a fundamental thing. He had also said at that time that they had met 4 times. According to Jiang, it seemed as if “they came and I accepted the petition.” The principals have been involved parties from beginning to end. This does not mean that accepting the petition will solve the problem, but we should take the initiative to organize relevant meetings. Parents are the parties involved and should come together to the meeting. He sarcastically said, “Have you taken the citizens into account? I think it’s a very clear case actually.”

Summary FAQ


  • Shen Boyang criticized Jiang Wanyan for often “asking A and answering B” in debates, and said that his answers contained a lot of misinformation and even spread rumors, which made him very disappointed. He also believed that the rules of debate were limited to immediate clarification.


  • Facing the result that 47% of respondents believed he performed better and 40% believed Jiang Wannan was better, Shen Boyang said that the public has its own public opinion and surveys can only reflect a part of the phenomenon; In terms of the overall election situation, he is still in the lead and will work hard to come back and win in the last 27 days.


  • Regarding the fairness of being given the topic outline first, Shen Boyang believed that it was not unfair because the format and arrangement of the debate had already been negotiated. As far as child abuse cases are concerned, he emphasized that meeting parents is the most basic thing, and meetings should be actively organized to allow parents to participate, rather than just receiving petitions.

Share on Social Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *