AI summary
Summary of article:
Commenting on the Taipei mayoral debate, Luo Zhiqiang praised Chiang Wannan for his familiarity with municipal affairs and his sharp attack and defense. He also criticized Shen Boyang for vague comments and not being familiar with municipal affairs. He also speculated that he might want to rely on the second debate to make a comeback.
mayor of taipeixiang wannan Democratic Progressive Party’s Taipei mayoral candidateshen boyang First TV debate between the two countries ends, KMT MLAluo zhiqiang He commented that Jiang Wannan was efficient and full of confidence in municipal administration. His opening speech directly related to his political achievements and his counter-attack was precise and his performance exceeded expectations. On the other hand, Shen Boyang’s policies are vague and “nonsense”. He is unfamiliar with municipal administration and his self-confidence is frustrated. He is not even able to answer those questions from the media for which he can prepare in advance.
Luo Zhiqiang said that Jiang Wannan’s performance this time, I believe everyone who has seen it will have the same feeling. It exceeded expectations and was very exciting. Jiang was full of confidence and Shen Boyang made criticisms. Jiang Neng relied on his rich municipal experience to directly point out mistakes or things that Shen had not thought about. After several waves of attack and defense, it was clear that Shen’s confidence was disappointed, and Jiang was superior to Shen in terms of confidence.
Luo Zhiqiang said that municipal efficiency is Jiang Wannan’s specialty. At the beginning of his speech, Chiang took a different approach from Shen Boyang. Shen talked about his birth, moving abroad, and returning to Taipei, lasting about 2 minutes before talking about municipal matters. Shen probably forgot that this was the Taipei mayor’s debate. Chiang, on the other hand, went straight to the point from the beginning, noting and taking into account all the political achievements. It was his efficiency in municipal administration that weighed heavily on the agenda.
Luo Zhiqiang pointed out that when Shen Boyang raised questions, Jiang Wannan was able to immediately counterattack. This was also because Jiang was familiar with municipal affairs. For example, when Shen questioned “there is fresh milk in every classroom,” Chiang immediately retorted: Executive Director Zhuo Rongtai said “there is fresh milk in every classroom.”
Luo Zhiqiang commented on Shen Boyang. When Shane talks about stand-up comedy, Shane makes empty arguments that can’t be tested. However, when both sides in the municipal debate attack and defend each other, Shane’s shortcomings are revealed. For example, Shane mentioned “having each other’s back.” Many people don’t know what “accompanying” is. He also told everyone that the most important thing is to start and finish construction, which is a “nonsense body” that everyone is very familiar with. When caught spouting nonsense on the Internet, they may survive many trials, but when put on the debate stage, they will find that they are unfamiliar with municipal matters and have become a lackey.
Luo Zhiqiang said that Shen Boyang lacks confidence and Shen Ti hopes for a second debate. The explanation is that he felt he was not good at debating, so he wanted to add a second one and use the second one to make a comeback. But Shen forgot that when Shen was yelling for debate, it was Cao Jingcheng who told Shen not to argue, so Shen stopped yelling.
Luo Zhiqiang also stressed that he has an open attitude towards debate and is waiting for the media, including “Liberty Times”, to invite the second debate. So far, no date has been given for the talks, which have been delayed by two weeks. Should Shen Boyang first ask Cao Jingcheng if he would allow the debate? Shane’s performance was not much different from expectations.
Luo Zhiqiang said that the only thing that surprised him was Shen Boyang’s vagueness, jumpiness, and instability in his position. Debates offense and defense were all immediately raised. Shane may not have enough reaction time. This is excusable as he is not familiar with municipal administration. Shen could not react instantly to many immediate offenses and defenses. However, it came as a surprise during the media question forum. Media questions were given to both sides two days in advance, so that they could be fully prepared. As a result, the media’s questions were still vague and guilty, and they could not answer the actual content. Either Shen did not work hard or he was genuinely unfamiliar with municipal administration.
In response to Shen Boyang’s campaign director general Wu Siyao’s criticism that Jiang Wannan was looking at the manuscript, Luo Zhiqiang said that the manuscript was only for reference, and Shen Boyang would also refer to the manuscript. Usually, the number of times he read the manuscript was counted only at the end when he raised a white flag and dedicated the material.
Summary FAQ
-
Luo Zhiqiang believes that Jiang Wannan is confident and efficient in municipal administration. He talks directly about his political achievements in the beginning and can answer questions immediately. His overall performance exceeded expectations, and he clearly surpassed Shen Boyang in terms of speed and content.
-
He pointed out that Shen Boyang often used long background stories instead of policy answers, such as mentioning “with the city” but lacking specific content. Even questions asked in advance by the media could not answer the actual municipal content.
-
Luo Zhiqiang explained that Shen Boyang wanted a second game because he did not perform well in the first game and hoped to take advantage of the second opportunity to make a comeback. He also stressed that he is ready for another debate, but has not yet waited for the media to be arranged.
