AI summary
Summary of article:
During the Taipei mayoral debate, Shen Boyang questioned Chiang Wannan’s implementation of several municipal SOPs and policies; Chiang criticized the other side for spreading false information. There was a heated exchange between the two sides on nutritious lunch, trees and fresh milk policies.
taipei mayor debate,Democratic Progressive Party taipei mayor candidateshen boyang question the current mayorxiang wannan The policy SOP is unclear, and issues include cigarette butts being picked up by civil servants in smoke-free cities, skyrocketing budgets for umbrellas and lack of suppliers for nutritious lunches. How to establish SOPs should be clearly explained to citizens. Jiang said that all these questions were false claims, including the issue of nutritious lunches and tree cutting. Shen repeatedly used false claims and information attacks, but never mentioned it when faced with the city government’s explanation.
Shen Boyang pointed out that Jiang Wannan did not feel that he had a clear understanding of the SOP. For example, the smoke-free city went out on the road without completing the assessment, causing civil servants to schedule shifts to count cigarette butts; Chhatri’s budget rapidly increased from 14 million to 50 million in the last three months; The slogan for nutritious lunches was raised to increase the budget, but the school could not find a supplier before the start of school; Drop in exchange rate of fresh milk for students; And brinjal trees were cut down in Dongmen Market. These were problems where there were difficulties in establishing SOPs.
Jiang Wannan pointed out that unfortunately all of Shen Boyang’s suspicions were lies, including that a free nutritious lunch does not mean a discount on quality. Through original bidding and control methods, even Mayor Shen Tongdang was willing to follow. Now, to protest the election, he deliberately spreads false statements, claiming that the Jinhua Junior High School case was mass food poisoning. However, it turned out that the inspections were completely merited and that many parents and students were hurt without apology.
Faced with questions about trees, Jiang Wannan said Shen claimed that trees in Songshan District had declined significantly. He issued a press release and attended a press conference to clarify that Shane was continuously making false statements. The fact is that the area has increased by 808 square meters and the trees and bushes have also increased by 16,000. At that time, the central government was unable to implement the fresh milk policy or was unwilling to even commit funds. He personally came to meet with the four major supermarket and store operators to take stock of the various difficulties and solve them one by one, but Shen did not fight for it in the Legislative Yuan.
Shen Boyang questioned that Jiang did not answer the question about the Dongmen eggplant tree. As far as free nutritious lunch is concerned, he did not deny it. He just stressed that it would be better to implement it with a good system. He did not say there was food poisoning because he hoped it would be tested quickly, and the loss of canopy was also a problem in Zhongyan. The information provided by the hospital did not say that it was the city government that made the cut. Even said that it could be a private person or project. Jiang Wannan said that he was sending false information just now, “What you said from beginning to end is false information.” When asked how Jiang Wannan’s SOP was established? How to comply? Can this be explained clearly to the public?
Jiang Wannan responded that Shen Boyang is following the report of the China Research Institute, but the city government has repeatedly issued clarifications in press releases and press conferences. However, Shen must still provide such information. Reduction of tree crowns does not mean cutting down trees. Most of them relate to private land developments and university campuses. However, Shen repeatedly said that the Taipei city government and civil servants cut down trees indiscriminately, which caused him great regret. Taipei City planted more than 40,000 trees in four years, but never mentioned it.
Regarding nutritious lunch, Jiang Wannan even pointed out that Shen Boyang’s theory of talking about “three chapters, one queue”, “three rules and one chapter” does not understand even the most basic concepts. Does he really care about children’s nutritious lunches? He said that after the elections he is only worried about children and nutritious lunch. However, he has remained consistent on this path and will continue to improve various policies.
Summary FAQ
-
Shen Boyang focused on municipal SOPs and implementation issues, including smoke-free cities, umbrella budgets, nutritious lunch supplies, raw milk, and naming trees in Dongmen Market. He believed that Jiang Wannan should clearly explain to citizens how the system is set up and implemented.
-
Jiang Wannan emphasized that free nutritious lunches do not mean discounting quality, and the city government still implements them according to the original bidding and inspection methods. He also pointed out that Shen Boyang described the Jinhua Junior High School case as large-scale food poisoning, which hurt parents and students, but he never apologized.
-
Shen Boyang cited data from Academia Sinica to question the reduction in tree cutting and believed there was a problem with the city government’s SOP; Jiang Wannan said that reducing tree crowns does not mean cutting down trees, and most of them belong to private or campus lands. Regarding the fresh milk policy, he said the city government individually coordinated with supermarkets and shops to implement it.











